davidkirkpatrick

October 21, 2009

Homebuyer tax credit to be expanded

Expansion to the tune of almost doubling the credit to $15,000 and allowing people other than first-time home buyers into the program. Now that’s some Main Street stimulus, but like “Cash for Clunkers” it’s geared to help one group of industries. Home building and finance in the latest case, automotive in the first case.

From the link:

Congress is considering proposals to greatly expand a soon-to-expire $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers — potentially applying it to all but the wealthiest homebuyers.

Supporters say doing so would further boost home sales, stabilize housing prices and generate jobs. Opponents say extending and expanding the credit would be a waste of money and only temporarily stave off further price declines.

The credit now can be claimed by anyone buying a home who has not owned one for three years and who closes the deal by Nov. 30.

Beyond extending that deadline, some lawmakers want to make the credit available to all homebuyers who meet income eligibility requirements. And some want to increase the amount of the credit from $8,000 to $15,000.

Currently the first-time home buyer credit is available in full to those buying their primary residence who make $75,000 or less ($150,000 for joint filers). A partial credit is available to those making between $75,000 and $95,000 ($150,000 to $170,000 for joint filers).

Did you like this? Share it:

Outlier detection and bank failure

Because we know everything in place up to the end of last year failed miserably.

The release:

Banking on outlier detection

Simple computer model could act as early warning system for failing banks

Recent bank failures point to the continuing need for vigilance by regulators and investors. Now, a report in the International Journal of Operational Research, discusses the possibility of an early-warning system that spots the outliers before they fail.

The downfall of dozens of banks and financial organizations across the globe has been in the headlines since the meltdown of the subprime mortgage market, but even during the decade before, 1997 to 2007, more than forty banks failed in the US.

Randall Kimmel of the Department of Finance, at Kent State University, and colleagues David Booth and Stephane Elise Booth explain that there are numerous financial computer models that can predict specific outcomes for a given bank. However, these programs require large amounts of data available only to the banks themselves and the regulators and this data requires lots of preparation and manipulation for the model to work properly.

Bank regulators have the resources to handle the data and to use the complex computer models. But, these are significant barrier for researchers and individual investors. Kimmel and colleagues have now shown that a simple model with minimal data demands can be effective in the early detection of potentially troubled banks.

They suggest that banks that are similar to one another in size, based on total assets or total loans, should be similar to one another in terms of the associated returns or risk factors, namely net operating income and net loan losses respectively. “The further from its peers a bank is in terms of these variables, the more likely it is a potentially troubled bank,” Kimmel explains, “In terms of statistical analysis, such a bank would be an outlier.”

A problem bank can be defined as a bank with lots of high risk assets compared with total reserves, it is usually one that is performing poorly relative to other banks of a similar size – it is a statistical outlier, in other words. Such outliers distort the traditional statistical analyses making it difficult to spot them among the more average performers.

The KSU team has now developed a new application of a mathematical model, a Locally Weighted Scatter Plot Smooth, which they say requires minimal data preparation. More critically, it can be run in many off-the-shelf statistical software packages. Their model could be very effective as an early warning system for detecting potential bank failures.

“Our solution to this problem is to use a special type of regression, called LOESS,” explains Kimmel, “It gives more weight to the information about a particular bank the more similar it is to a peer bank, using this to build a profile (prediction equation) of what a bank should look like.” He adds that one then compares the actual information from the banks, which is in the public domain, with this profile. “Our research indicates that this technique, using readily available information and statistical software, is able to identify potentially problematic banks,” says Kimmel.

The researchers suggest that the same approach could be extended to the analysis of other industries, especially those that are highly regulated like utilities.

###

“The analysis of outlying data points by robust Locally Weighted Scatter Plot Smooth: a model for the identification of problem banks” in Int. J. Operational Research, 2010, 7, 1-15

(Co-posted from here.)

Did you like this? Share it:

October 20, 2009

Main Street gets stimulus

The stimulus plan finally comes to Main Street. This is something that should have happened months ago. Better late than never, I guess.

From the link:

President Obama will visit a Maryland business on Wednesday afternoon to announce initiatives to encourage lending to small businesses. According to an administration official, the proposal will increase the caps for existing Small Business Administration loans and give smaller banks better access to funds from the Troubled Assets Relief Program.

An industry official involved in S.B.A. lending said the White House would propose raising the cap on the agency’s flagship 7(a) loan from $2 million to $5 million. But other programs are likely to see increases, too, including the 504 program.

There is one caveat, though:

Changing S.B.A. programs would be subject to Congressional approval.

(Co-posted from here.)

Did you like this? Share it:

Credit card industry facing Congressional smackdown

No surprise there. Credit is certainly a privilege and not a right, but the industry players have proven to be bad actors when operating without significant oversight. With the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act scheduled to go into full effect over the next year — different provisions begin at different times — the industry took the grace period as an opportunity to gouge customers in the midst of this economic climate.

Needless to say Congress isn’t looking too kindly on Main Street being put under that much more economic pressure. The credit industry might want to start making major concessions and end predatory practices lest Congress decides the new act doesn’t go far enough.Now that the recovery is looking quite jobless and by appearance, if nothing else, mostly benefits Wall Street and the topmost tier of “haves,” a Democrat-controlled government may want a few pounds of flesh for the “have-nots” in this scenario.

From Saturday’s NYT editorial:

Some of the worst (and most common) abuses are now scheduled to be outlawed in February. These include the practice of arbitrarily raising interest rates, penalizing customers when they are late paying a bill unrelated to the credit card — so-called universal default — and charging customers interest on debt that they paid off a month or more earlier.

The banks claimed that they needed the long lead time to rework their computer processing system. Consumer advocates warned that this would invite banks and credit card companies to wring as much as possible out of consumers before the law finally took effect.

They were right.

A forthcoming study from the Pew Charitable Trusts’ Safe Credit Cards Project shows that credit card interests rates — already too high — rose by 20 percent in the first two quarters of this year, even though the cost of lending went down as a result of low federal interest rates. In testimony before Congress earlier this month, one consumer advocate cited case after case of struggling consumers who had seen their credit card rates more than double for no apparent reason, even when they had faithfully paid on time.


(Co-posted from here.)

Did you like this? Share it:

Wall Street and taking risk

Filed under: business,finance — Tags: , , , , — DavidKonline @ 5:02 pm

This BusinessWeek article is actually about the demise of risk-taking in Silicon Valley, and it does a great job of identifying some of the players who’ve collectively killed risk in the one-time land of starry-eyed entrepreneurs.

The final culprit — Wall Street — and the indictment against it is interesting, true and really applies across the spectrum of business sectors as a succinct reminder of the myriad problems facing the Street and what has become business as usual. Particularly the point about Sarbox and why entrepreneurs might shy away from IPOs.

From the first link:

WALL STREET

Wall Street hasn’t played as direct a role in Silicon Valley since the late 1990s, when analysts like Mary Meeker and bankers like Frank Quattrone knew as much about new startups in the Valley as the VCs did. That’s part of the problem.

Startups have to want to go public in order to go for the home run. And most entrepreneurs today just don’t. Blame it on bankers and analysts who no longer care about a company with a sub-$500 million capitalization; blame it on Sarbanes-Oxley; blame it on activist hedge funds who don’t give CEOs the leash to innovate; blame it on scars from companies going public in the 1990s that had no business going public and paid the price.

But too many great entrepreneurs sell early not because they’re lazy, not because they want a quick buck, but because the idea of running a company all the while trying to meet quarter-by-quarter Wall Street estimates is antithetical to risk-taking.

Verdict: There’s got to be a reward for all that risk, and until the public markets become a place great entrepreneurs aspire to get to, that risk-reward equation is hopelessly lopsided.

(Co-posted from here.)

Did you like this? Share it:

More bad news for Swiss banking customers …

Filed under: business,finance — Tags: , , , , — DavidKonline @ 4:37 pm

UBS to its clients – “oops.”

From the link:

UBS, the embattled Swiss bank that is being forced to divulge the names of about 4,450 account holders to the IRS, may have inadvertently tipped its hand on their identities by sending them registered letters through the U.S. Postal Service.

(Co-posted from here.)

Did you like this? Share it:
« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress